From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9EB115A0 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71FD1711 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:57:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <1559836116.15946.27.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190606155846.GA31044@kroah.com> <1559838569.3144.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190613104930.7dc85e13@coco.lan> <1560436507.3329.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190613142621.6a934377@coco.lan> <1560451292.3329.51.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190613161141.41f90b83@coco.lan> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:57:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190613161141.41f90b83@coco.lan> (Mauro Carvalho Chehab's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:11:41 -0300") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Pull network and Patch Acceptance Consistency List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mauro, > Yeah, a tool or a CI bot test with would help to identify > binary-identical changes would be really helpful, as this could help a > lot maintainers to decide either to take or not cleanup patches > (including those coccinelle stuff) without requiring hardware testing. That would be extremely helpful. I would love to make that a requirement for SCSI acceptance. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering