From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813D1BEC for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596CD1ED for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:42:35 +0000 (UTC) To: Andrew Lunn From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20188905.kHbMkj7sB6@avalon> <1834084.5qZ8rLimvk@avalon> <1492631703.3217.30.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <3f55980c-1e8d-c841-2555-472ed10eb2fc@sandisk.com> <20170426084253.yvxyzb3khh2fej4j@mwanda> <20170426141503.GB665@lunn.ch> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:42:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170426141503.GB665@lunn.ch> (Andrew Lunn's message of "Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:15:03 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ksummit , Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , Doug Ledford , Bart Van Assche , David Miller , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Andrew, > What works well with netdev is that the maintainers simply NACK the > patches within a day and ask them to be submitted in smaller batches. > > In my opinion, part of being a Maintainer is educating patch > submitters how the process should work and how best to present their > work so that it can be reviewed. It takes a bit of effort, but the > returns are worth it. It's not for lack of trying. But the response typically that "our internal process/version number/qual cycle/release schedule is more important than getting the patches upstream". I think that's probably more of an issue in SCSI than in other subsystems due to enterprise manufacturer inertia... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering