On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:01:11 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Looks like a patch useful for fixing up this mess, but I don't quite see > the point of merging this given that you fix things for real in the next > one ... Good point. In the development process, this was the patch which made things work, so it's purely an artifact of that. I'll merge this with the subsequent patch. -- keith.packard@intel.com