On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:14 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > This code is still present in Linus' tree, and still crap. Any > reviewers for this series? It all looks reasonable to me, and Chris reviewed or ack'd every patch but #4, which looks reasonable on the surface to me. Are you thinking this should land in 3.1? Or 3.2? -- keith.packard@intel.com