From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262152AbTJGOaI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:30:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262269AbTJGOaI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:30:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:15075 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262152AbTJGOaF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:30:05 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: devfs vs. udev Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20031007142349.GX1223@rdlg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ViW6nsTxla4o3A2bUyA2eWVvksU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Robert L. Harris" writes: > As a pro-devfs person I felt the same and hate to say it but "read the > archives". Someone gave a good writeup on the problems with devfs and > how udev will (eventually) solve them. Does anyone have a more exact pointer? -- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net