From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 13:07:20 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] GCC 7.x vs. C++ comments In-Reply-To: <20180509134905.GK12235@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> (Tom Rini's message of "Wed, 9 May 2018 09:49:05 -0400") References: <5B756B92-A9EE-4227-9D8E-887F6E8E1597@theobroma-systems.com> <20180509111627.GD12235@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> <20180509113837.59F33240036@gemini.denx.de> <20180509114828.GG12235@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> <20180509124654.BFF71240036@gemini.denx.de> <20180509134905.GK12235@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Tom Rini writes: > - Shorter Please explain how // SPDX is significantly shorter than /* SPDX */ Having // comments next to /* ones is just hideously ugly. If some scanning tool is too stupid to handle standard C comments, it's the tool that needs to be fixed. -- Måns Rullgård