[PATCH v9 1/2] arm-soc: Import initial tango4 device tree

[mans@mansr.com (Måns Rullgård)]

Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:38 AM, M?ns Rullg?rd <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
>> Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 18/11/2015 17:05, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +           clkgen: clkgen at 10000 {
>>>>> +                   compatible = "sigma,tango4-clkgen";
>>>>> +                   reg = <0x10000 0x40>;
>>>>> +                   clocks = <&xtal>;
>>>>> +                   clock-output-names = "cpuclk", "sysclk";
>>>>> +                   #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>> +           };
>>>>
>>>> Would you please consider using my clock driver that matches the actual
>>>> hardware, supports all the clock outputs required for USB, SATA, etc,
>>>> and works on tango3 as well?
>>>
>>> I was hoping to take baby steps to work up to a fully-functional port.
>>> The first step (in my mind) is this submission: a minimal port which
>>> only requires the two "main" clocks.
>>>
>>> The next step will add to the minimal port by supporting as many
>>> peripherals as possible, as well as their required clocks.
>>
>> But the code already exists.  Why start over?
>
> M?ns, I don't understand your role in this. Can you clarify?

Oh, I'm just the guy who did all the work and then got screwed over by
Sigma.

> If you've already done a port, why haven't you contributed it
> yourself?

Because it's not yet in a shape to be contributed, just like Marc's
isn't.

> Why are you driving Marc's work from the back seat like this instead
> of submitting your own work?

I have submitted bits and pieces.  It's a slow process.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com