From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Subject: Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:32:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54B7F7CD.7030903@free.fr> <54CA6327.5070707@free.fr> <54CC174F.10703@free.fr> <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:07:18 -0800") Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mason Cc: Viresh Kumar , Linux ARM , Linux PM , cpufreq , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Mason writes: > Are you saying that use of DeviceTree is mandatory for new ARM ports? Yes. --=20 M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd mans@mansr.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mans@mansr.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:32:40 +0000 Subject: RFC on cpufreq implementation In-Reply-To: <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:07:18 -0800") References: <54B7F7CD.7030903@free.fr> <54CA6327.5070707@free.fr> <54CC174F.10703@free.fr> <54D162B6.2050602@free.fr> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mason writes: > Are you saying that use of DeviceTree is mandatory for new ARM ports? Yes. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mans at mansr.com