From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261815AbTJHWnt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:43:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261817AbTJHWnt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:43:49 -0400 Received: from c-36a870d5.037-69-73746f23.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([213.112.168.54]:11904 "EHLO ford.pronto.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261815AbTJHWnt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:43:49 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Software RAID5 with 2.6.0-test From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:43:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is software RAID5 stable in Linux 2.6.0-test7? A while back I tried running a software RAID5 with a 2.6.0-test kernel, and had to spend the evening running fsck. The corruption could have been caused by something other than the RAID layer. So, is it considered safe to use RAID5 in 2.6.0 kernels? I sort of dislike the try and see approach with matters like this. -- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net