From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754907AbbKJSF2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:05:28 -0500 Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]:42597 "EHLO unicorn.mansr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754867AbbKJSF0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:05:26 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: Eric Dumazet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, slash.tmp@free.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: ethernet: add driver for Aurora VLSI NB8800 Ethernet controller References: <1447172063-27234-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <1447178145.17135.75.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:05:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1447178145.17135.75.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> (Eric Dumazet's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:55:45 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Dumazet writes: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 16:14 +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> This adds a driver for the Aurora VLSI NB8800 Ethernet controller. >> It is an almost complete rewrite of a driver originally found in >> a Sigma Designs 2.6.22 tree. > > ... > >> + >> +static void nb8800_receive(struct net_device *dev, int i, int len) >> +{ >> + struct nb8800_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); >> + struct nb8800_rx_desc *rxd = &priv->rx_descs[i]; >> + struct page *page = priv->rx_bufs[i].page; >> + int offset = priv->rx_bufs[i].offset; >> + void *data = page_address(page) + offset; >> + dma_addr_t dma = rxd->desc.s_addr; >> + struct sk_buff *skb; >> + int size; >> + int err; >> + >> + size = len <= RX_COPYBREAK ? len : RX_COPYHDR; >> + >> + skb = napi_alloc_skb(&priv->napi, size); >> + if (!skb) { >> + netdev_err(dev, "rx skb allocation failed\n"); >> + dev->stats.rx_dropped++; >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + if (len <= RX_COPYBREAK) { >> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&dev->dev, dma, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); >> + memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), data, len); >> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&dev->dev, dma, len, >> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE); >> + } else { >> + err = nb8800_alloc_rx(dev, i, true); >> + if (err) { >> + netdev_err(dev, "rx buffer allocation failed\n"); >> + dev->stats.rx_dropped++; >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + dma_unmap_page(&dev->dev, dma, RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); >> + memcpy(skb_put(skb, RX_COPYHDR), data, RX_COPYHDR); >> + skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, page, >> + offset + RX_COPYHDR, len - RX_COPYHDR, >> + RX_BUF_SIZE); >> + } >> + >> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev); >> + netif_receive_skb(skb); >> +} >> + > > Any reason you do not use napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb) instead of > netif_receive_skb() ? Because I haven't been following the netdev list closely for the last five years, and no documentation I read mentioned this function. I can certainly change it. -- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com