From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263015AbTJULku (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:40:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263061AbTJULku (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:40:50 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:25788 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263015AbTJULkt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:40:49 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test8] Difference between Software Suspend and Suspend-to-disk? Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200310211315.58585.lkml@kcore.org> <20031021113444.GC9887@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:c667u1DquqN1SpfIWS94EDiTOYY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tomas Szepe writes: >> Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL) >> Suspend-to-Disk Support > > They're competing implementations of the same mechanism. And neither one works reliably, I might add. They both appear to save the current state to disk, but no matter what I try, I can't make it resume properly. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se