All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
To: huangjun <hjwsm1989@gmail.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] compile error on centos 5.9
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:03:22 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1308042100330.5645@cobra.newdream.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FF1100.2000004@gmail.com>

[Moving to ceph-devel]

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, huangjun wrote:
> hi,all
> i compiled ceph 0.61.3 on centos 5.9,the "sh autogen.sh" and
> "./configure " is ok, but when i "make", an error occurs, the err log:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:
> In function ?int rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const
> std::string&, const std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:83:
> error: ?class __gnu_cxx::lock? is not a function,
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:59: error: conflict with ?int
> rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:62: error: in call to ?lock?
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:
> In member function ?void
> rados::cls::lock::Lock::lock_shared(librados::ObjectWriteOperation*)?:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:83:
> error: ?class __gnu_cxx::lock? is not a function,
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:59: error: conflict with ?int
> rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:181: error: in call to ?lock?
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:
> In member function ?int
> rados::cls::lock::Lock::lock_shared(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&)?:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:83:
> error: ?class __gnu_cxx::lock? is not a function,
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:59: error: conflict with ?int
> rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:187: error: in call to ?lock?
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:
> In member function ?void
> rados::cls::lock::Lock::lock_exclusive(librados::ObjectWriteOperation*)?:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:83:
> error: ?class __gnu_cxx::lock? is not a function,
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:59: error: conflict with ?int
> rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:193: error: in call to ?lock?
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:
> In member function ?int
> rados::cls::lock::Lock::lock_exclusive(librados::IoCtx*, const
> std::string&)?:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/concurrence.h:83:
> error: ?class __gnu_cxx::lock? is not a function,
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:59: error: conflict with ?int
> rados::cls::lock::lock(librados::IoCtx*, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, ClsLockType, const std::string&, const std::string&, const
> std::string&, const utime_t&, uint8_t)?
> cls/lock/cls_lock_client.cc:199: error: in call to ?lock?
> make[3]: *** [cls_lock_client.o] Error 1
> 
> the gcc version is 4.1.2, does this make a difference?

I suspect so.  Mark Nelson successfully built on RHEL5 a while back but 
needed to use a newer gcc.

> what should i do if i want to use ceph-fuse client on centos 5.9? must
> compile the ceph? or just compile the ceph-fuse code?

Right.. you only need the ceph-fuse code.  'make ceph-fuse' may do the 
trick.  Otherwise, you'll need to just strip out the osd stuff from 
Makefile.am.

Either way, let us know how it goes, as others would benefit from this as 
well!

Thanks-
sage

       reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <51FF1100.2000004@gmail.com>
2013-08-05  4:03 ` Sage Weil [this message]
2013-08-05  9:51   ` [ceph-users] compile error on centos 5.9 huangjun
2013-08-06 14:58     ` huangjun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1308042100330.5645@cobra.newdream.net \
    --to=sage@inktank.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hjwsm1989@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.