All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH] xen/x86: don't lose event interrupts
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:23:00 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604151814580.2526__36695.253433618$1460769889$gmane$org@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> (raw)

On slow platforms with unreliable TSC, such as QEMU emulated machines,
it is possible for the kernel to request the next event in the past. In
that case, in the current implementation of xen_vcpuop_clockevent, we
simply return -ETIME. To be precise the Xen returns -ETIME and we pass
it on. However the result of this is a missed event, which simply causes
the kernel to hang.

Instead it is better to always ask the hypervisor for a timer event,
even if the timeout is in the past. That way there are no lost
interrupts and the kernel survives. To do that, remove the
VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future flag.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index a0a4e55..6deba5b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -290,11 +290,11 @@ static int xen_vcpuop_set_next_event(unsigned long delta,
 	WARN_ON(!clockevent_state_oneshot(evt));
 
 	single.timeout_abs_ns = get_abs_timeout(delta);
-	single.flags = VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future;
+	/* Get an event anyway, even if the timeout is already expired */
+	single.flags = 0;
 
 	ret = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_set_singleshot_timer, cpu, &single);
-
-	BUG_ON(ret != 0 && ret != -ETIME);
+	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
 
 	return ret;
 }

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2016-04-16  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-16  1:23 Stefano Stabellini [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-21 13:34 [PATCH] xen/x86: don't lose event interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-02 18:09 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-04-16  1:23 Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-21  8:59 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-21  8:59 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-25 10:28   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-25 10:28   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='alpine.DEB.2.10.1604151814580.2526__36695.253433618$1460769889$gmane$org@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260' \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.