All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/28] lustre: pfl: Basic data structures for composite layout
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 01:57:03 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1812270153560.5850@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87va3raev2.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>


> > From: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>
> >
> > Added basic structures and magic numbers for composite layout.
> >
> 
> This would be a great place to (brief) explain what PFL does and what it
> is going to do with this data structures.
> What are the "components" and how do they form a "composite layout" ??

Would the link - http://wiki.lustre.org/PFL_Prototype_High_Level_Design
be enough ?
 
> > +
> > +enum lov_comp_md_entry_flags {
> > +	LCME_FL_PRIMARY		= 0x00000001,   /* Not used */
> > +	LCME_FL_STALE		= 0x00000002,   /* Not used */
> > +	LCME_FL_OFFLINE		= 0x00000004,   /* Not used */
> > +	LCME_FL_PREFERRED	= 0x00000008,	/* Not used */
> > +	LCME_FL_INIT		= 0x00000010,	/* instantiated */
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define LCME_KNOWN_FLAGS	LCME_FL_INIT
> 
> What is a "KNOWN" flags?  What isn't known about the other ones?

Patrick answered this one :-)

> > + * bit of lcme_id is used to indicate that the ID is representing
> > + * certain LCME_FL_* but not a real ID. Which implies we can have
> > + * at most 31 flags (see LCME_FL_XXX).
> > + */
> > +enum lcme_id {
> > +	LCME_ID_INVAL	= 0x0,
> > +	LCME_ID_MAX	= 0x7FFFFFFF,
> > +	LCME_ID_ALL	= 0xFFFFFFFF,
> > +	LCME_ID_NONE	= 0x80000000
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define LCME_ID_MASK	LCME_ID_MAX
> 
> Why is MASK a #define, but MAX an enum ??

Actually I looked and this mask is only needed for server code. Sadly 
developers are still using lustre_idl.h and lustre_user.h as dumpsters :-(
Will remove.

> > +
> > +struct lov_comp_md_entry_v1 {
> > +	__u32			lcme_id;	/* unique id of component */
> > +	__u32			lcme_flags;	/* LCME_FL_XXX */
> > +	struct lu_extent	lcme_extent;	/* file extent for component */
> > +	__u32			lcme_offset;	/* offset of component blob,
> > +						 * start from lov_comp_md_v1
> > +						 */
> > +	__u32			lcme_size;	/* size of component blob */
> > +	__u64			lcme_padding[2];
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +enum lov_comp_md_flags;
> 
> This enum is empty, and never used.
> 
> It eventually gets some LCM_FL_* names added... maybe it should wait
> until those are added??

Also removed. Strange this exist in the 2.10 branch but its not used.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-27  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-17 16:29 [lustre-devel] [PATCH RFC 00/28] lustre: PFL port to linux client James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/28] lustre: pfl: Basic data structures for composite layout James Simmons
2018-12-17 23:54   ` NeilBrown
2018-12-18  1:47     ` Patrick Farrell
2018-12-27  1:57     ` James Simmons [this message]
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/28] lustre: lov: move code for PFL work James Simmons
2018-12-18  0:00   ` NeilBrown
2018-12-27  1:59     ` James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/28] lustre: lov: merge lov_mds_md_v3 and lov_mds_md_v1 handling James Simmons
2018-12-18  0:09   ` NeilBrown
2018-12-18  1:49     ` Patrick Farrell
2018-12-27  2:10       ` James Simmons
2018-12-27  2:04     ` James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/28] lustre: lov: fold lmm_verify() handling into lmm_unpackmd() James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/28] lustre: lov: create struct lov_stripe_md_entry James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/28] lustre: lov: add composite layout unpacking James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/28] lustre: lov: embedded raid0 in struct lov_layout_composite James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/28] lustre: lov: migrate lov raid0 to future PFL component handling James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/28] lustre: lov: reduce code indentation James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/28] lustre: lov: change lo_entries to array James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/28] lustre: lov: move around PFL code and cleanups James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/28] lustre: lov: remove lsm_stripe_by_[index|offset]_plain James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/28] lustre: lov: add looping lsm_entry_count times James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/28] lustre: lov: create lov_comp_* wrappers James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/28] lustre: clio: client side implementation for PFL James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 16/28] lustre: clio: getstripe support comp layout James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/28] lustre: pfl: enhance PFID EA for PFL James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/28] lustre: pfl: dynamic layout modification with write/truncate James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/28] lustre: pfl: calculate PFL file LOVEA correctly James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 20/28] lustre: lov: keep minimum LOVEA size James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/28] lustre: pfl: Read should not trigger layout write intent James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 22/28] lustre: pfl: fix hang with grouplocks James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 23/28] lustre: pfl: fix ost pool op->size handling James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 24/28] lustre: lov: readahead shouldn't exceed component boundary James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:29 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 25/28] lustre: uapi: support negative flags James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:30 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 26/28] lustre: llite: return v1/v3 layout for legacy app James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:30 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 27/28] lustre: llite: restore ll_file_getstripe in ll_lov_setstripe James Simmons
2018-12-17 16:30 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 28/28] lustre: lov: do not split IO for single striped file James Simmons
2018-12-18  6:21 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH RFC 00/28] lustre: PFL port to linux client NeilBrown
2018-12-20  1:39   ` NeilBrown
2018-12-27  1:53     ` James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1812270153560.5850@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.