[PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Relax bit clock divider searching

[PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Relax bit clock divider searching

[Shengjiu Wang]

With S20_3LE format case, the sysclk = rate * 384,
the bclk = rate * 20 * 2, there is no proper bclk divider
for 384 / 40, because current condition needs exact match.
So driver fails to configure the clocking:

wm8962 3-001a: Unsupported BCLK ratio 9

Fix this by relaxing bitclk divider searching, so that when
no exact value can be derived from sysclk pick the closest
value greater than expected bitclk.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
---
changes in v2:
- Add debug message according to Charles's comments

 sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
index ce4666a74793..34080f497584 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
@@ -2403,6 +2403,7 @@ static const int sysclk_rates[] = {
 static void wm8962_configure_bclk(struct snd_soc_component *component)
 {
 	struct wm8962_priv *wm8962 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
+	int best, min_diff, diff;
 	int dspclk, i;
 	int clocking2 = 0;
 	int clocking4 = 0;
@@ -2473,23 +2474,25 @@ static void wm8962_configure_bclk(struct snd_soc_component *component)
 
 	dev_dbg(component->dev, "DSPCLK is %dHz, BCLK %d\n", dspclk, wm8962->bclk);
 
-	/* We're expecting an exact match */
+	/* Search a proper bclk, not exact match. */
+	best = 0;
+	min_diff = INT_MAX;
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs); i++) {
 		if (bclk_divs[i] < 0)
 			continue;
 
-		if (dspclk / bclk_divs[i] == wm8962->bclk) {
-			dev_dbg(component->dev, "Selected BCLK_DIV %d for %dHz\n",
-				bclk_divs[i], wm8962->bclk);
-			clocking2 |= i;
+		diff = (dspclk / bclk_divs[i]) - wm8962->bclk;
+		if (diff < 0) /* Table is sorted */
 			break;
+		if (diff < min_diff) {
+			best = i;
+			min_diff = diff;
 		}
 	}
-	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs)) {
-		dev_err(component->dev, "Unsupported BCLK ratio %d\n",
-			dspclk / wm8962->bclk);
-		return;
-	}
+	wm8962->bclk = dspclk / bclk_divs[best];
+	clocking2 |= best;
+	dev_dbg(component->dev, "Selected BCLK_DIV %d for %dHz\n",
+		bclk_divs[best], wm8962->bclk);
 
 	aif2 |= wm8962->bclk / wm8962->lrclk;
 	dev_dbg(component->dev, "Selected LRCLK divisor %d for %dHz\n",
-- 
2.27.0

Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Relax bit clock divider searching

[Charles Keepax]

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:34:37AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> With S20_3LE format case, the sysclk = rate * 384,
> the bclk = rate * 20 * 2, there is no proper bclk divider
> for 384 / 40, because current condition needs exact match.
> So driver fails to configure the clocking:
> 
> wm8962 3-001a: Unsupported BCLK ratio 9
> 
> Fix this by relaxing bitclk divider searching, so that when
> no exact value can be derived from sysclk pick the closest
> value greater than expected bitclk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>

Thanks,
Charles

Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Relax bit clock divider searching

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:34:37 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> With S20_3LE format case, the sysclk = rate * 384,
> the bclk = rate * 20 * 2, there is no proper bclk divider
> for 384 / 40, because current condition needs exact match.
> So driver fails to configure the clocking:
> 
> wm8962 3-001a: Unsupported BCLK ratio 9
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: wm8962: Relax bit clock divider searching
      commit: 51309c5bec7cfe567a00a667adbffea444845543

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark