From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B95C433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B791023975 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:04:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B791023975 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176E518C3; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:04:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 176E518C3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1611230691; bh=GwniMszQglKYUpcfa2aoGjvzB7XuUWi6RXaHC1wpryg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=E/6J2dkWWSkAvc0On/JGTeTe3rLLBx+bq7QYasTE8LSKVdayJ6Ogh1XxkNSNHKGqo JpSlSmYi1LF8SivuouGqxLmVDLK2O+Q6/HuDZM+YHAupLYvvVhHRaQDlAi+V+43g0S t3w1fYvcC6wtKF7nNhm86F9ooaqt5n0VWIEGnLdg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C716F80255; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:04:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id CF869F80257; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:03:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD6BF80162 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:03:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 4DD6BF80162 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="zEXssm+f" Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id c124so1226045wma.5 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 04:03:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vuLJ7p5ilfIWpz7PW8WlQI72IXUVIdtMvIHeFbz24w4=; b=zEXssm+figj+fIPe8hEn2JG7m79MYv83+6paGQx2LUIHT8guPQSBUNuQc3+xKbL2Ss rxTRjElqWHDgex07G7TvnzUskB+a0tz0cvG3GnmYQjjBS7FeygrjR/H3bpLh+oulYD4J kZUxB0hvpmq2D3vmV17wjSBIe6VyWYlr0EA2FjkdYwouyNLoe1GH++aBdFX0Xnq/MzPs cbXQP5iAbUZD6v/jDWkciFxlPqK9KsQnRTncv8vAATMrsG/SU1YkyQ1TiQeUXx2PwL+M HaYevWr3WWDIlUBjQOC7TEanYxGtS+70GSBdYOR0ZcxLyQjIaLwIH33A+XvOAjfohU/l a5wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vuLJ7p5ilfIWpz7PW8WlQI72IXUVIdtMvIHeFbz24w4=; b=P461vZ/2LgWvd9rshbxqyMpenCcwL7ZrB4/29YqKljxyU99FDmb7+r868AJ4/1Z/Ix aNR/4o2m5XAjKIni9xFfdSkAPb5x0HZXhXfP/5TSw4kkZFgy4Pm8sxOaFXi+KAx4z65p 20++gQhxyxqLQ8S1xPB2mZoEUWjAxRson8Ax26NehQYnkw8EcaPEhDmioYa/zCvCOZM2 sIAAxt5iIszUYA5ECOORyBOCGikYUgAtwFa+yG2bHe7+JkWBX4xSWMNPP1p9bRlXH4j7 wgRLnpzW3IhYX5xkMffY68RBuLfEv75voEZj/HY2GzVhmNkEfFcqYtCdVqFZE5n/dXpq mMWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UFiJVkaoiVLTTyt82u5v4h5Duoaab4vP+jR3xFZoq5Q5+hsdi V3XK2jB6ZiQ4MBM6GKeM+PGpbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxqriq44Jy62yZDNpVCqIweGCa+fd8anF6p7WTiBOksuCirEJkV8YRgzzex/wi6ldb9flfsA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2003:: with SMTP id g3mr5969108wmg.90.1611230635237; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 04:03:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.86.34] (cpc86377-aztw32-2-0-cust226.18-1.cable.virginm.net. [92.233.226.227]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x81sm3288060wmg.40.2021.01.21.04.03.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 04:03:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: debugfs: use controller id instead of link_id To: Pierre-Louis Bossart , Vinod Koul References: <20210115162559.20869-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20210119145220.GS2771@vkoul-mobl> <45300dc3-00b0-497b-804e-f7f1e857f32a@linux.intel.com> <57d5f1bd-50fa-30ab-03c0-260460e45d61@linaro.org> <6d4d4a6b-f28c-81db-4e67-2b5b94116fa4@linux.intel.com> From: Srinivas Kandagatla Message-ID: <1fad2388-27d0-7014-818d-1272fa70ed9b@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:03:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6d4d4a6b-f28c-81db-4e67-2b5b94116fa4@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 19/01/2021 19:09, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >> currently we have >> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/master-* >> >> Are you suggesting that we have something like this: >> >> /sys/kernel/debug/soundwire/xyz-controller/master- ?? > > Yes this is what I was thinking about. Vinod/Pierre, One Question here, Why is link_id part of "struct sdw_bus", should it not be part of "struct sdw_master_device " ? Given that "There is one Link per each Master" --srini