From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] ASoC: fsi/rcar: fixup SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx flags Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:55:51 +0900 Message-ID: <20140313235551.GB28137@verge.net.au> References: <87txb3rjzw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140313104836.GN366@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140313104836.GN366@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Morimoto , Linux-SH , Linux-ALSA , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:48:36AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:47:36PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, Simon > > > > These patches fixup Renesas fsi/rcar driver's > > SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBx_CFx flag settings. > > > > I had misunderstand these settings... > > But this is still [RFC], since it modifies DT side code too. > > > > >> Mark > > > > #1 patch depends on Jyri's > > "Fix simple-card *-master DT parameter handling" > > if it was accepted > > > > >> Simon > > > > Can you check #1 patch which modifys SH-ARM platform ? > > So, we need to do something quickly here since this affects DT bindings > but it would be *much* better to avoid having to set the master flags on > both ends of the link since that's going to make the binding confusing > if we're stuck with it as an ABI. > > Simon, are you OK with the arch side of cleanups for this going via my > tree? Yes, I'll provide an Ack for them accordingly. Do you anticipate that they will end up in v3.15-rcX? If not, could I get a branch with stable commit ids that I can use as a basis for futher shmobile changes: I'd like avoid conflicts bubbling up.