alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	nsekhar@ti.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
	zonque@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Constraint on the period and buffer size based on FIFO usage
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:42:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140318124243.GV11706@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53283DA4.2080609@ti.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:35:48PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/17/2014 06:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It's sounding like if we should be doing it this is a general
> > thing which we should be constraining presumably it'd apply to all
> > drivers, not just this one, and so shouldn't be being fixed in the
> > driver but it's not obvious to me why the period constraint isn't
> > sufficient.

> It can only be done if we have fixed FIFO for the dai. Right now this is kind
> of true for McASP. In HW we actually have 64 32bit word FIFO and currently you
> can set the desired FIFO depth via DT/pdata. I'm not really happy about this

Sorry, what I meant was more the bit where you were setting the
constraint on both the buffer and the period than the constraint itself
- that seemed somehow redundant.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-14 14:42 [PATCH v2 0/4] ASoC: davinci: edma dmaengine PCM and mcasp preparation Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ASoC: davinci: Add edma dmaengine platform driver Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-16 10:54   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-17 16:20   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Provide correct filter_data for dmaengine for non-DT boot Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-17 16:21   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Constraint on the period and buffer size based on FIFO usage Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-16 11:18   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-17 13:28     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-17 16:52       ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18 12:35         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-18 12:42           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-03-14 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Assign the dma_data earlier in dai_probe callback Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-17 16:44   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140318124243.GV11706@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=jsarha@ti.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=zonque@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).