From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sakari Ailus Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] media: omap3isp: remove unused clkdev Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 00:53:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20150302225336.GV6539@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20150302170538.GQ8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <118780170.u6ZO5zJrEk@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <118780170.u6ZO5zJrEk@avalon> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Russell King , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Laurent and Russell, On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:33:44AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Russell, > > On Monday 02 March 2015 17:06:06 Russell King wrote: > > No merged platform supplies xclks via platform data. As we want to > > slightly change the clkdev interface, rather than fixing this unused > > code, remove it instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > There are quite a few out of tree users that I know of that might be impacted. > On the other hand, out of tree isn't an excuse, and OMAP3 platforms should > move to DT. The good news is that DT support for the omap3isp driver is about > to get submitted, and hopefully merged in v4.1. I thus have no objection to > this patch. > > Sakari, does it conflict with the omap3isp DT support ? If so, how would you > prefer to resolve the conflict ? Russell, would it be fine to merge this > through Mauro's tree ? I first thought it wouldn't conflict, but apparently it does. The conflicting patches are here: Tne entire set: I haven't sent that to linux-media yet but I'll do that during the coming couple of days. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk