alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:25:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200122202530.GG3833@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26ae4dbd-b1b8-c640-0dc0-d8c2bbe666e2@linux.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1404 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 01:28:57PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 1/22/20 1:07 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:

> > The code which checks the return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link() call
> > in soc_tplg_fe_link_create() moved the snd_soc_add_dai_link() call before
> > link->dobj members initialization.

> > While it does not affect the latest kernels, the old soc-core.c code
> > in the stable kernels is affected. The snd_soc_add_dai_link() function uses
> > the link->dobj.type member to check, if the link structure is valid.

> > Reorder the link->dobj initialization to make things work again.
> > It's harmless for the recent code (and the structure should be properly
> > initialized before other calls anyway).

> > The problem is in stable linux-5.4.y since version 5.4.11 when the
> > upstream commit 76d270364932 was applied.

> I am not following. Is this a fix for linux-5.4-y only, or is it needed on
> Mark's tree? In the latter case, what is broken? We've been using Mark's
> tree without issues, wondering what we missed?

He's saying it's a fix for stable but it's just a cleanup and robustness
improvement in current kernels - when the patch 76d270364932 (ASoC:
topology: Check return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link()) was backported
by the bot the bot missed some other context which triggered bugs.

Copying in Sasha and Greg for stable (not sure if the list works by
itself).

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 19:07 [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 19:28 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-01-22 20:25   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2020-01-22 20:49     ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 21:47       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-01-23  6:43     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-23 12:36 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order" to the asoc tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200122202530.GG3833@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).