From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A2AC2D0EF for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E7920776 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="OynL6RTK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="0SipEdYF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42E7920776 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB381614; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:10:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 8AB381614 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1587129056; bh=RRba6wPPTqjpsH0OjxHPYeFUfwOwgaWHcsijRhGcngs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=OynL6RTKA5A3LiZZDKIrh7FuVsEWn4UbyFlvGXVMtLFHLa0iW0jsP2zszXkP4A9/H wtpW6pb5i+FVONrewgs0FIsomaZ3c0h0J74MdPr8Re94On6BHYyx9LU0Jp1xRP9UOz zKUBVMzjP8MmJipmtKaRIXtgT751momjS2PTvTxQ= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B90F80245; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 0381DF80264; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E74F8012E for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:10:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz D4E74F8012E Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="0SipEdYF" Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40A3020776; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:09:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587128999; bh=RRba6wPPTqjpsH0OjxHPYeFUfwOwgaWHcsijRhGcngs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0SipEdYFywJX8vX1lGhp4UcOy7NWWetGIN1vCVYDam++YLGA0abuUUon8lmda9tE8 pmwT0/tPOS8nmSRIoSSJL9Qa0Xvo5ShRJXNQY7eC6Ac/DFbHczHRMxPhYg/T0WnHoj m6TRHRM6MHCymSV9M+iLN2kLWmmwOyzDJs6/BUgU= Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:09:57 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: qdsp6: fix default FE dais and routings. Message-ID: <20200417130957.GE5315@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200311180422.28363-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20200417112455.GA7558@gerhold.net> <03d0d14c-d52c-460b-0232-184156f62eb7@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03d0d14c-d52c-460b-0232-184156f62eb7@linaro.org> X-Cookie: MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephan Gerhold , lgirdwood@gmail.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:02:08PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 17/04/2020 12:24, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > but IMO the FE DAIs are a negligible overhead compared to the routing > > matrix and the many BE DAIs that are really never going to be used > > (because nothing is physically connected to the ports). > Two things, one unnecessary mixers, second thing is we need to know how many > FE dais are in the system, which should be derived from the number of dai > child nodes. These can potentially be SoC specific or firmware specific. You shouldn't be worrying about unused mixers, ideally we'd be walking the DAPM graph and masking things - this isn't something that should be open coded at individual driver levels. --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl6ZqqQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dx2wf+JNU4DCIuulhKdv9CWhaYh0GdbA2kVhxyPC/Nh8Dr+PCJgEhQJbG9Pb3l 7z5u2/jJJndtNN0b0eL/mDe3NHHDlVk+yMxHpMQtQo0jKOx6T1H5sqbf1VKzUxsx eVZbUx83uWue5jFIw/NaXReWU7Kj7nxTflD3ZsPtjNaziBKdLngMEw9LR3codEdv pGi7O37Hq/x8M9RxaAyHMl24A004IQEJIHrovNYXh+0jkfM+F1Qa8dw+8396taVl W9TusTxBN67tzIz0SEm/ygj2HXNDUIp4zW6MMPA9Udu0y7VntNWTs1qZ2Qs5M94/ QQUxJjIdhB5BllEj4JfxRxn3aZudAw== =vbwg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t--