From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389D8C433DF for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 06:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B304C2075A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 06:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="DUEZU/DU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FwpZoje1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B304C2075A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9202B16C6; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:45:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 9202B16C6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1596350755; bh=X3mkD7RZZ1AgeK/4J92tDZwIJB1+lI9JjZ0GBWy5Zm4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=DUEZU/DUESJztAIS2dEFh5+vcb/XpGIFK0C458zELFiqA+Nl/hLyBD7CxtFoUFWv5 7/ipThV9AHdsKhwP+WlqhNXvZUnSLt8nKXj2hUH6TKro+7anX8AiVSciXCPQ1RH1Yx WfQ4hQWegTt0F0+Nf1yRraXwESw9GyBDWpNDQ+tc= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864F9F800B7; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:44:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id DBE3FF8015D; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:44:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6D3F800B7 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:44:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 0C6D3F800B7 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FwpZoje1" Received: from localhost (unknown [122.171.202.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB597207FB; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 06:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596350654; bh=X3mkD7RZZ1AgeK/4J92tDZwIJB1+lI9JjZ0GBWy5Zm4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FwpZoje1TbIJ68iQaOJPnkY+RgtH8WlN+xSMXPSBBaOn8oxBGhheVwuDc9JVBRnH4 sla6un5LhRbtbsmAgUVFxkXufDH+UVzNk+nKL6TAaSm/vmHnPqI2ibQe/x9DWVTKhU rbaB+oQXX0/XzVKiuhiDzG59i/7Zb9XMrMIakM0c= Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 12:14:09 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix Kconfig dependency issue with DMAENGINES selection Message-ID: <20200802064409.GH12965@vkoul-mobl> References: <20200731152433.1297-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <20200731164744.GF12965@vkoul-mobl> <20200731204206.GC24315@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200731204206.GC24315@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Hyun Kwon , Randy Dunlap , Liam Girdwood , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Michal Simek , Alexandre Bounine , Mark Brown , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Matt Porter X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 31-07-20, 23:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently > > > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but > > > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular > > > dependencies: > > > > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected! > > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8: symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB > > > drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80: symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74: symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig:6: symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30: symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR > > > sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60: symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C > > > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst > > > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations" > > > > > > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix > > > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends > > > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all > > > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged > > > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I > > > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole > > > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion. > > > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul > > Thank you. > > As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could > you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ? Dmaengine? I see three patches none of which touch dmaengine.. Did I miss something? Thanks -- ~Vinod