From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECA2C433DF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE65820738 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="Riz3ESUF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gerhold.net header.i=@gerhold.net header.b="GPi9DFWT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CE65820738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gerhold.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B32827; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:36:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 15B32827 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1596451020; bh=RHkpwyjryi6JHjIPlbhVNIU07EpQjI30NYzZYQUd1Ek=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Riz3ESUFrQEMDHDbu0jeQ3GroYPXpBA6W0JO1b1UyBdal/n0IjHF/BWgS5qiAkwap Mt10o2ZHPBDn5gbdqPsRrRvswFpIRS/gbt3OBTLwLXsuXOiSHMbXC2OlitTzWRvq40 yyBFUlveAJjXtK+sMbDrYy06rNCKfLPkMiK6L3rQ= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D197F801F7; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id E0A03F80218; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de [85.215.255.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F14DF80148 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:35:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 0F14DF80148 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gerhold.net header.i=@gerhold.net header.b="GPi9DFWT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1596450955; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=t1ANuzu9hbGFzPXIEXz8SJSfuIqBra8EUQdOPeq1B3w=; b=GPi9DFWTfEUU1qlMR7j+CBbNuNm1NyXihHNr4PfzjfPU5PrwG3XrkjW4OKOTeI+e8F h69mRi53mciqG39tIxiNEjMZyBnPgRJrUdUDHt0ZpDoBCXhEjORvY4wlCSHHnSwn/M8S 5MUJ5EXp01j4z3O+/4vWGOOtWlAS30agMm3f/IE85XgLooZCwuBkTOEzSq8+I+HQkahx 0Gk9aTxvEyGyvBCxNguwCPODXiu3MiPfaRwDyH1L+4t1h9u4vEKny+50u6sz1NFFBWLs OjN12bevEVGdPHBl1hDuLNn5yhu3cMQ3w2bJtIFVZ8+e1uPkoCcP6I3W3jrSFFPn7ajD +cEQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVOQ/OcYgojyw4j34+u26zEodhPgRDZ8j7IcrHBg==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gerhold.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.10.5 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Y0939ew73AZgyYI (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:35:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:35:37 +0200 From: Stephan Gerhold To: Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: core: Add common helper to parse aux devs from device tree Message-ID: <20200803103537.GA903@gerhold.net> References: <20200801100257.22658-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <1j5za02hlr.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1j5za02hlr.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kuninori Morimoto , Kevin Hilman , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:39:44AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > When you send multiple patches like that, you should a cover-letter > describing the overall purpose of the patchset, then the patches > > If you look around on the mailing list this cover is usually starting > with the subject "[PATCH 0/X]" > > Apart from this, the change looks good to me > > Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet > Thanks! I usually do that but I thought in this case the first patch is descriptive enough for the whole series. I would have just repeated the same in the cover letter. Stephan