From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADB0C433DF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577F8207BB for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="Vcb5vOlg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ua92POSn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 577F8207BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F901674; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:40:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz D2F901674 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1597866098; bh=4AK5v821zy1PWvts/5ogFBjV+oVDZUgiOW/Z26HFexU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Vcb5vOlgk0Ligg+AfspDduLQYOmHDfNvNJ6LApoqflpZ99aM674Bd3j36u5dZvL7B wjikPvxSnV4n5EV7npAjRCpF6LBFOu6pZ3ig1dSHzCYH8Df4D9CoffwVpWHEWYN56l W8EMc1MqueaGqKqjnINaR6Jt6ak95RQqfAiihqjE= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA76F8011C; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:40:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 6D75EF80216; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:40:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59483F800D3 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:40:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 59483F800D3 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ua92POSn" Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F545207BB; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:40:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597866038; bh=4AK5v821zy1PWvts/5ogFBjV+oVDZUgiOW/Z26HFexU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ua92POSnqY57JylYmFlW/zoes2kP0GYGQbu4I2NNqI7oKhrS+kId6nciud6UtU/53 xxjtEqyOGHXub4q0MJZENkMJiLMST98/X3qRGgvZaSsOkDwX/+1iT3sCek7q/zCe9/ 6H3LuAli7CzlhN/nPXo39fhV7mSt1VLrJDKdV/2k= Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:40:05 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Tzung-Bi Shih Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt6359: add codec document Message-ID: <20200819194005.GC38371@sirena.org.uk> References: <1597644455-8216-1-git-send-email-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com> <1597644455-8216-3-git-send-email-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com> <20200819103730.GB5441@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Absence makes the heart grow frantic. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: ALSA development , howie.huang@mediatek.com, Takashi Iwai , Jiaxin Yu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , shane.chien@mediatek.com, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, eason.yen@mediatek.com, Matthias Brugger , bicycle.tsai@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:42:27PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > But I found struct mfd_cell also contains member .of_compatible. What > is the difference if we use compatible string (as is) for this device > instead of falling back to use device name to match? That's for binding the MFD subdevice to an OF node, you don't need to do that for a device like this - you can just use the of_node of the parent to get at the properties. --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl89gBUACgkQJNaLcl1U h9D/+gf/Ux+96dRrUQezVV+5UF/r90Gm5dpzj3qN3D3o9ZNOhCUt2+i9Js4F/YDL LL4dlrRI1Yg/CpFwunLwTiy3q2xYqUIFODQq/u2fkSDyejrXkt6R3NqxlaG5Jc0K EpOxKm07grdw9WOWls6UmbeJLTL8jHp2KWUqGL5t2KiVLPAaxXvCOzI5MugAp3W1 B80S4jndViv3IEGEgKqvuS8PxVxmXuNe1gVH6arMvmDmK2NQWEIpit4dpWiuT7UY EbAJsnABzE8jasbBRLHt5F7VRdU004CyjtsoZswk9b+otbSwvW82CRUQ8oD7t83+ VQcrX/wlkN3yNdkNF4CwrbBmV9d7sA== =eiwO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq--