On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:00:39AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 9/17/20 6:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Normally we would just add a delay in the driver unconditionally, why
> > make this a module paramter?  If there are board variations then we
> > should be getting them from board data, not forcing individual users to
> > bodge things with a module parameter.

> that wasn't the intent. 400ms is the recommended value, but the parameter
> provides a way to experiment without having to recompile during
> integration/debug stages.

> It was my recommendation to add this parameter, I don't mind removing it if
> you prefer it that way. Or I can respin the commit message and comments to
> make it clearer what the intended use was.

It'd be better to just remove it.  If you want a facility to experiment
for testing debugfs is a better fit I think, unless this is a delay that
only gets done once during probe of course in which case that wouldn't
work.