Re: [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: Add DJM750 to Pioneer mixer quirk

[Olivia Mackintosh <livvy@base.nu>]

Hi all,

I did a little exploration of this before too and though I would share my
notes FWIW.

Some things we might be able to do right off the bat:
	1. Move wIndex from each item into the control group:
>		struct snd_pioneer_djm_option_group {
>			const char *name;
>			const struct snd_pioneer_djm_option *options;
>			const size_t count;
>			const u16 default_value;
>			const u16 windex;
>		};
>
	2. Generate labels based on wValue perhaps in the fashion of
		where each case is an enum or define (e.g. PHONO = 0x3):
>		static char *snd_pioneer_djm_get_label(u8 input_type) {
>		      switch (input_type) {
>		      case LINE:      return "Control Tone LINE\0";
>		      case CDLINE:    return "Control Tone CD/LINE\0";
>		      case PHONO:     return "Control Tone PHONO\0";
>		      case PFADER:    return "Post Fader\0";
>		      case XFADERA:   return "Cross Fader A\0";
>		      case XFADERB:   return "Cross Fader B\0";
>		      case MIC:       return "Mic\0";
>		      case RECOUT:    return "Rec Out\0";
>		      case AUX:       return "Aux\0";
>		      case NONE:      return "None\0";
>		      case PFADERCH1: return "Post Fader CH1\0";
>		      case PFADERCH2: return "Post Fader CH2\0";
>		      default:	return "\0"; // 'EINVAL'
>		};
>}	

This should get us 90% to where we need to be. I originally had lots of
huge code snippets that I were going to send but I think this is more
readable!

Other wildcard ideas I explored:
	1. Bitmask of values stored in u32 private_data. This could work
		since it only takes up 12bits but it seems like an abuse of
		private_data's intended function and it feels like the
		unwrapping process would be somewhat length and messy.

		I think this is similar to your idea Fabian.

---

Maybe these notes will help provide some inspiration or something.
If I have the time I'll pick up from here tomorrow. Comments/input/
different ideas very welcome :).

Kindest regards,
Olivia


On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 10:37:21PM +0100, Fabian Lesniak wrote:
> Hi Franta,
> 
> I've just submitted mixer quirks for the 900NXS2, following the design of 
> Olivia and you. Seems quite clean, but if anyone comes up with a clever idea 
> on how to share code between the channel arrays, I'd highly appreciate that. 
> My experiments so far turned out quite complex: I thought about adding flags 
> like "DEVICE_HAS_DIGITAL", "DEVICE_HAS_AUX" etc. which are evaluated during 
> control creation and usage. The code became unreadable and complex, so I 
> ditched that idea. Creating the controls arrays dynamically would maybe help.
> 
> The 900NXS2 uses the same wValue/wIndex as your 250Mk2, just expanded to five 
> channels. It does not allow to set playback channels via USB, that can only be 
> done in hardware using the input source knob. I guess that is same for the 
> DJM-700. The 900NXS2 allows querying the currently selected playback channel 
> though, but I think this is of no great use so I did not implement it in this 
> patch (although it was in my original draft from last year: https://
> gist.github.com/flesniak/074ab23bbc833663b782f44174eae6a4). If you think it's 
> worth it, I could have a look at that again.
> 
> Cheers
> Fabian
> 
> Am Montag, 1. Februar 2021, 16:34:29 CET schrieb František Kučera:
> > Dne 29. 01. 21 v 15:09 Fabian Lesniak napsal(a):
> > > In general, I'm wondering whether it is a good way to implement more and
> > > more Pioneer devices in such a hard coded way. mixer_quirks.c already has
> > > >3k LOC, and the 900NXS2 support will add at least 100 more if written in
> > > the same scheme. It may be good to either dynamically create controls
> > > depending on the model or move pioneer support to an extra file.
> > 
> > The original idea was to reduce complexity rather than lines of code and
> > keep it straightforward without many IF branching and special cases.
> > 
> > Maybe more data/configuration (declared arrays) can be shared among multiple
> > devices – like the capture_level.
> > 
> > Does not the DJM750 support also mapping of MIC, AUX and REC OUT or any
> > playback mapping? If it would, more configuration might be shared. And is
> > it DJM-750MK2 or DJM-750-K? At least the specification of DJM-750-K talks
> > about a sound card with 4 stereo inputs and 4 stereo outputs.
> > 
> > Does anybody know/have other DJM hardware? Does it use the same codes
> > (wValue/wIndex)?
> > 
> > Franta
> 
>