Re: More Generic Audio Graph Sound Card idea

[Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>]

Hi Mark, Morimoto-san,


>>> Having an audio-graph-card2 isn't ideal but may be required at least
>>> during development :/  Ideally we'd be able to have the new driver parse
>>> both binding formats (or rather, have the new binding format be new use
>>> cases for the same binding format) and only use -card2 while it's in
>>> development.
>> If you want to update current audio-graph-card without creating new
>> audio-graph-card2, I'm OK about it. But need adjusting / agreement.
>>
>> Current audio-graph-card "DSP" user is only me, and I'm using it only locally.
>> Thus upstream doesn't get damage if I removed "audio-graph-scu-card"
>> (= DSP use case) support.
>>
>> OTOH, Sameer is posting patch for "-cc-" support. If it was accepted
>> and he used it on upstream (= on tegra),
>> keeping compatibility will be very difficult and/or code will be very confusable.
>>
>> If Sameer can OK and wait new audio-graph-card, maybe we have no compatibility issue.
>> But in such case, 1st version of new audio-graph-card might be not enough for him.
>> Sameer need to waiting / testing / adjusting / etc, etc...
> The problem I'm feeling is that new card (= let's call it as card2 here) and
> Sameer's posting "-cc-" are conflicted / no-compatibility.
> It expands card1 DPCM detection.
>
> The good things having "-cc-" is that he can use it immediately.
> the bad things is that it is dificult to keep compatibility between "card1 + -cc-" and "card2".
>
> Creating card2 for development purpose is very welcome for me, and card1 user :)
> But after that, if we want to merge card1 and card2, we need to drop "-cc-" support unfortunately.
> If we want to keep "-cc-", we need to have both card1 / card2.
>
> So, how to handle it ?
>
>
Need your help for clarity on above. Currently I cannot publish v3 for 
[0] unless above is resolved.

[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/5/42

Thanks,
Sameer.