From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, hui.wang@canonical.com,
broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
jank@cadence.com, mengdong.lin@intel.com,
sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
rander.wang@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: cadence: fix race condition between suspend and Slave device alerts
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:14:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77ecb4bc-10d6-8fbd-e97f-923d01a5e555@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200828080024.GP2639@vkoul-mobl>
> Is this timeout for suspend or resume? Somehow I was under the
> assumption that it is former? Or is the result seen on resume?
>
> Rereading the race describe above in steps, I think this should be
> handled in step c above. Btw is that suspend or runtime suspend which
> causes this? Former would be bigger issue as we should not have work
> running when we return from suspend call. Latter should be dealt with
> anyway as device might be off after suspend.
This happens with a system suspend. Because we disable the interrupts,
the workqueue never completes, and we have a timeout on system resume.
That's why we want to prevent the workqueue from starting, or let it
complete, but not have this zombie state where we suspend but there's
still a wait for completion that times out later. The point here is
really making sure the workqueue is not used before suspend.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-28 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 22:23 [PATCH] soundwire: cadence: fix race condition between suspend and Slave device alerts Bard Liao
2020-08-19 9:06 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-19 12:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-21 5:07 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-21 15:17 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-28 8:00 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-28 15:14 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-09-08 11:58 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-09-09 7:59 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77ecb4bc-10d6-8fbd-e97f-923d01a5e555@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mengdong.lin@intel.com \
--cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).