[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: soc-core: remove soc_remove_dai_links()

[Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>]

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) which is paired function of
snd_soc_instantiate_card() (A) is calling soc_remove_dai_links() (*)
to remove card related resources, but it is breaking
add/remove balance (B)(b)(C)(c)(D)(d), in other words
these should be called from soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a)
from balance point of view.

More headacke is that it is using original removing method for
dai_link even though we already have snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
which is the function for it (d).

This patch removes snd_soc_remove_dai_links() and balance up code.

	static void soc_remove_dai_links(...)
	{
		...
(b)		soc_remove_link_dais(card);
(c)		soc_remove_link_components(card);

		for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) {
			...
			/* it should use snd_soc_remove_dai_link() here */
(d)			list_del(&link->list);
		}
	}

(a)	static int soc_cleanup_card_resources(...)
	{
		...

		/* remove and free each DAI */
(*)		soc_remove_dai_links(card);
		...
	}

(A)	static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
	{
		...
		/* add predefined DAI links to the list */
		for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link)
(B)			snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link);
		...
		/* probe all components used by DAI links on this card */
(C)		ret = soc_probe_link_components(card);
		...
		/* probe all DAI links on this card */
(D)		ret = soc_probe_link_dais(card);
		...
	}

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index b16a9422..a34000d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1275,23 +1275,6 @@ static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void soc_remove_dai_links(struct snd_soc_card *card)
-{
-	struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
-
-	soc_remove_link_dais(card);
-
-	soc_remove_link_components(card);
-
-	for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) {
-		if (link->dobj.type == SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK)
-			dev_warn(card->dev, "Topology forgot to remove link %s?\n",
-				link->name);
-
-		list_del(&link->list);
-	}
-}
-
 static int soc_init_dai_link(struct snd_soc_card *card,
 			     struct snd_soc_dai_link *link)
 {
@@ -1924,6 +1907,8 @@ static void soc_check_tplg_fes(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 
 static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 {
+	struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
+
 	/* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */
 	if (card->snd_card) {
 		snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
@@ -1931,7 +1916,12 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 	}
 
 	/* remove and free each DAI */
-	soc_remove_dai_links(card);
+	soc_remove_link_dais(card);
+	soc_remove_link_components(card);
+
+	for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
+		snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);
+
 	soc_remove_pcm_runtimes(card);
 
 	/* remove auxiliary devices */
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel