From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_cpu/codec_dai_name() macro
Date: 09 Mar 2021 10:07:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im61uobf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfaxuoc3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
soc-pcm needs DAI name and it will be "multicpu/multicodec" if it has
many DAIs. But current code is using very verbose for it.
This patch uses macro and makes code simple.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 9b5ab7a05f65..60e688b103d8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -29,6 +29,15 @@
#define DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS 8
+static inline const char *soc_cpu_dai_name(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
+{
+ return (rtd)->num_cpus == 1 ? asoc_rtd_to_cpu(rtd, 0)->name : "multicpu";
+}
+static inline const char *soc_codec_dai_name(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
+{
+ return (rtd)->num_codecs == 1 ? asoc_rtd_to_codec(rtd, 0)->name : "multicodec";
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
static const char *dpcm_state_string(enum snd_soc_dpcm_state state)
{
@@ -697,8 +706,8 @@ static int soc_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct snd_soc_component *component;
struct snd_soc_dai *dai;
- const char *codec_dai_name = "multicodec";
- const char *cpu_dai_name = "multicpu";
+ const char *codec_dai_name = soc_codec_dai_name(rtd);
+ const char *cpu_dai_name = soc_cpu_dai_name(rtd);
int i, ret = 0;
for_each_rtd_components(rtd, i, component)
@@ -737,12 +746,6 @@ static int soc_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
/* Check that the codec and cpu DAIs are compatible */
soc_pcm_init_runtime_hw(substream);
- if (rtd->num_codecs == 1)
- codec_dai_name = asoc_rtd_to_codec(rtd, 0)->name;
-
- if (rtd->num_cpus == 1)
- cpu_dai_name = asoc_rtd_to_cpu(rtd, 0)->name;
-
if (soc_pcm_has_symmetry(substream))
runtime->hw.info |= SNDRV_PCM_INFO_JOINT_DUPLEX;
@@ -2741,8 +2744,7 @@ static int soc_create_pcm(struct snd_pcm **pcm,
else
snprintf(new_name, sizeof(new_name), "%s %s-%d",
rtd->dai_link->stream_name,
- (rtd->num_codecs > 1) ?
- "multicodec" : asoc_rtd_to_codec(rtd, 0)->name, num);
+ soc_codec_dai_name(rtd), num);
ret = snd_pcm_new(rtd->card->snd_card, new_name, num, playback,
capture, pcm);
@@ -2841,8 +2843,7 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
pcm->no_device_suspend = true;
out:
dev_dbg(rtd->card->dev, "%s <-> %s mapping ok\n",
- (rtd->num_codecs > 1) ? "multicodec" : asoc_rtd_to_codec(rtd, 0)->name,
- (rtd->num_cpus > 1) ? "multicpu" : asoc_rtd_to_cpu(rtd, 0)->name);
+ soc_codec_dai_name(rtd), soc_cpu_dai_name(rtd));
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 1:07 [PATCH v3 0/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup each functions Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: check DAI activity under soc_pcm_apply_symmetry() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:07 ` Kuninori Morimoto [this message]
2021-03-09 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: direct copy at snd_soc_set_runtime_hwparams() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_update_symmetry() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_hw_sanity_check() Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: fixup dpcm_be_dai_startup() user count Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: remove unneeded !rtd->dai_link check Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-09 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: share DPCM BE DAI stop operation Kuninori Morimoto
2021-03-12 20:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup each functions Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87im61uobf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--to=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).