From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
cujomalainey@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:25:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ4TGvtwO5ySCEkT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124084514.28002-4-allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/mediatek/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/firmware/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../linux/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.h | 72 ++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 216 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/mediatek/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/mediatek/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.h
The patch should move before the 2nd patch in the series as the 2nd patch uses mtk-adsp-ipc.h.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c b/drivers/firmware/mediatek/mtk-adsp-ipc.c
[...]
> +int adsp_ipc_send(struct mtk_adsp_ipc *ipc, unsigned int idx, uint32_t op)
> +{
> + struct mtk_adsp_chan *dsp_chan = &ipc->chans[idx];
> + struct adsp_mbox_ch_info *ch_info = dsp_chan->ch->con_priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (idx >= MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM)
> + return -EINVAL;
If idx >= MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM, the invalid memory access has occurred at beginning of the function.
> +static int mtk_adsp_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[...]
> + device_set_of_node_from_dev(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.parent);
Why does it need to call device_set_of_node_from_dev()?
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> + chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> + if (!chan_name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dsp_chan = &dsp_ipc->chans[i];
> + cl = &dsp_chan->cl;
> + cl->dev = dev->parent;
> + cl->tx_block = false;
> + cl->knows_txdone = false;
> + cl->tx_prepare = NULL;
> + cl->rx_callback = adsp_ipc_recv;
> +
> + dsp_chan->ipc = dsp_ipc;
> + dsp_chan->idx = i;
> + dsp_chan->ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, chan_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsp_chan->ch)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsp_chan->ch);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request mbox chan %d ret %d\n",
> + i, ret);
If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, wouldn't it need to return -EPROBE_DEFER? It doesn't retry later if -EPROBE_DEFER.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 8:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] This patches provide ADSP IPC support for MT8195 allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: add adsp-mbox document allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mailbox: mediatek: add support for adsp mailbox controller allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 10:25 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25 1:51 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 6:23 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25 8:24 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 10:25 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2021-11-25 1:47 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25 6:26 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZ4TGvtwO5ySCEkT@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@google.com \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).