On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:52:12AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 12.12.2021 01:49, David Heidelberg пишет:
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    sound {
> > +        compatible = "nvidia,tegra-audio-rt5677-ryu",
> > +                     "nvidia,tegra-audio-rt5677";
> > +        nvidia,model = "NVIDIA Tegra Ryu";
> > +
> > +        nvidia,audio-routing =
> > +                "Headphone", "LOUT2",
> > +                "Headphone", "LOUT1",
> > +                "Headset Mic", "MICBIAS1",
> > +                "IN1P", "Headset Mic",
> > +                "IN1N", "Headset Mic",
> > +                "DMIC L1", "Internal Mic 1",
> > +                "DMIC R1", "Internal Mic 1",
> > +                "DMIC L2", "Internal Mic 2",
> > +                "DMIC R2", "Internal Mic 2",
> > +                "Speaker", "PDM1L",
> > +                "Speaker", "PDM1R";
> > +
> > +        nvidia,i2s-controller = <&tegra_i2s1>;
> > +        nvidia,audio-codec = <&rt5677>;
> > +
> > +        nvidia,hp-det-gpios = <&gpio 143 0>;
> > +        nvidia,mic-present-gpios = <&gpio 132 1>;
> > +        nvidia,hp-en-gpios = <&rt5677 1 0>;
> > +        nvidia,dmic-clk-en-gpios = <&rt5677 2 1>;
> 
> I spotted that nvidia,dmic-clk-en-gpios is undocumented, but DTs and
> binding are passing the validation. We will make another patch to fix it.
> 
> Rob, could you please tell whether this is because unevaluatedProperties
> doesn't work yet or we're missing something?

If you update dt-schema.git to the latest "main" branch you should have
most of what's needed to make unevaluatedProperties work. However, there
seems to be an issue with some $referenced schemas setting
additionalProperties to true and then that gets propogated to the schema
that included it.

Rob came up with the patch below to fix that:

--- >8 ---
diff --git a/dtschema/lib.py b/dtschema/lib.py
index 3cc5e428b0eb..a0f22aab935a 100644
--- a/dtschema/lib.py
+++ b/dtschema/lib.py
@@ -367,6 +367,9 @@ def fixup_sub_schema(schema, is_prop):
     if not isinstance(schema, dict):
         return

+    if 'additionalProperties' in schema and schema['additionalProperties'] == True:
+        schema.pop('additionalProperties', None)
+
     schema.pop('description', None)
     fixup_interrupts(schema)
     if is_prop:
--- >8 ---

I'm currently running the tools based on that and it's indeed been
flagging some properties as unevaluated that weren't there before.

Thierry