alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Cc: ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Dylan Reid <dgreid@google.com>,
	Jimmy Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: max98090: fix possible race conditions
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:08:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d97b9724-27d0-f157-ce5d-ed6c75bafae8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Px+wX2UtU3As-3Bf4rWn1kzqDMPw60xk508gDDaOPk6Q5dgw@mail.gmail.com>



On 11/21/19 12:17 AM, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:20 AM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Still you may want to clarify your second point and the commit message.
>> The first race condition was clear, the second one not so much.
>>
>> what did you mean with 'assert ULK == 0' and what does this map to in
>> pll_work
> 
> The case (2) race condition is based on the previous patch:
> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-November/158852.html

ah, ok, so that's a race you introduced :-)

> 
> After applying the patch, the code would be something like: (in the
> case, two threads read 0x01.)
> static void max98090_pll_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> [snip]
>          snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, M98090_REG_DEVICE_SHUTDOWN,
>                              M98090_SHDNN_MASK, 0);
>          snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, M98090_REG_DEVICE_SHUTDOWN,
>                              M98090_SHDNN_MASK, M98090_SHDNN_MASK);
> 
>          for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
>                  /* Check lock status */
>                  pll = snd_soc_component_read32(
>                                  component, M98090_REG_DEVICE_STATUS);
>                  if (!(pll & M98090_ULK_MASK))
>                          break;
> 
>                  /* Give PLL time to lock */
>                  usleep_range(1000, 1200);
>          }
> }

Sorry, I don't see at what point the race happens.

if your interrupt sees an ULK status, it will schedule the pll_work.
You only test the status again *after* switching the device on/off, so 
what is the side effect?

I am also wondering if you shouldn't sleep first in the loop, then check 
the status?

And in case you do have a side effect due to the clear on read, maybe 
you could save the status in a context and retest in the workqueue, that 
way you'd have a trace of the ULK event even if the register was cleared.

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20  6:02 [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: max98090: fix PLL unlocked workaround-related Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-20  6:02 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: max98090: remove msleep in PLL unlocked workaround Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-20 14:33   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-21  2:37     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-20  6:02 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: max98090: exit workaround earlier if PLL is locked Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-20  6:02 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: max98090: fix possible race conditions Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-20 14:32   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-21  2:19     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-21  3:20       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-21  6:17         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-21 15:08           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-11-21 16:49             ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2019-11-21 17:20               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-22  7:52                 ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d97b9724-27d0-f157-ce5d-ed6c75bafae8@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cychiang@google.com \
    --cc=dgreid@google.com \
    --cc=tzungbi@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).