alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: add PCI ID for CometLake-S
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:21:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f442ed39-1a86-28fb-b42c-b0e5273cd79a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hd0cm16vf.wl-tiwai@suse.de>




>>> I guess the change in ifdef for cml_desc definition is still missing.
>>
>> Not sure what change you are referring to?
> 
> Take a look at the definition of cml_desc.  It's wrapped with
> 
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_COMETLAKE_LP) || \
>          IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_COMETLAKE_H)
> 
> but this wasn't updated for the new COMETLAKE_S.

Ah yes, that's a problem. will fix.

>>> Also, can we reduce even the ifdef around sof_dev_desc definitions by
>>> __maybe_unused atttribute?
>>
>> Sorry, I am not following your suggestion. I would really like to keep
>> the ifdefs for now, and while it can be seen as overkill to have
>> descriptors that are identical in some cases the past experience shows
>> it's useful when we have to add quirks for specific 'hardware
>> recommended programming sequences'.
> 
> What I suggested was simple, just dropping ifdef by something like
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> index bbeffd932de7..297632a54f1b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(sof_pci_debug, "SOF PCI debug options (0x0 all off)");
>   
>   #define SOF_PCI_DISABLE_PM_RUNTIME BIT(0)
>   
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_APOLLOLAKE)
> -static const struct sof_dev_desc bxt_desc = {
> +static const struct sof_dev_desc __maybe_unused bxt_desc = {
>   	.machines		= snd_soc_acpi_intel_bxt_machines,
>   	.resindex_lpe_base	= 0,
>   	.resindex_pcicfg_base	= -1,
> @@ -52,10 +51,8 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc bxt_desc = {
>   	.ops = &sof_apl_ops,
>   	.arch_ops = &sof_xtensa_arch_ops
>   };
> -#endif
>   
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_GEMINILAKE)
> -static const struct sof_dev_desc glk_desc = {
> +static const struct sof_dev_desc __maybe_unused glk_desc = {
>   	.machines		= snd_soc_acpi_intel_glk_machines,
>   	.resindex_lpe_base	= 0,
>   	.resindex_pcicfg_base	= -1,
> @@ -70,10 +67,8 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc glk_desc = {
>   	.ops = &sof_apl_ops,
>   	.arch_ops = &sof_xtensa_arch_ops
>   };
> -#endif
> .....
>   
> 
> Then the issue I pointed above can be solved as well.

The ifdefs are still needed in the PCI IDs tables

static const struct pci_device_id sof_pci_ids[] = {
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_MERRIFIELD)
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x119a),
		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&tng_desc},
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_APOLLOLAKE)
	/* BXT-P & Apollolake */
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x5a98),
		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc},
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x1a98),
		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc},
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_GEMINILAKE)
	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x3198),
		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&glk_desc},
#endif

so for consistency I personally prefer the matching ifdef for the 
descriptors.


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26 14:14 [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: add PCI ID for CometLake-S Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-11-26 14:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-12-18  0:50   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-12-18  6:32     ` Takashi Iwai
2019-12-18 15:21       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-12-18 16:28         ` Takashi Iwai
2019-12-18 16:42           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-12-18 18:45             ` Takashi Iwai
2019-12-18 19:01               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-12-18 20:02                 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-12-18 20:07                   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f442ed39-1a86-28fb-b42c-b0e5273cd79a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).