From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BD6C34055 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5282465D for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=cmpxchg-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@cmpxchg-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Y0xUdyvI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA5282465D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmpxchg.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878C96EC4F; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AE06E82C for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id h4so668248qkm.0 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpxchg-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1IjE5f3DRWrL7DyNrD/EPrz9NqvpJo1LzwPmSu0Loyo=; b=Y0xUdyvI/KOwgnUyUAXVRQts2j2UDpi0MSoQ8O0ZIpFCbCbLaplKvU5pIrb49CIcHK Oko/yr/AtoCn2I7wP1Yz/l85vKpPmPYS2VLT7dy7v+KArYcmNL6mvY79eopcTfkaMHlR 6ad0zsqSYvukfQwQMDKXW3o2M1y+7ZLCHho3eH9+XHp9GDKhBElQTtLcwPW1OzZqDG+o ey+6JO61zvRaKvwJ1VNS2Jvb4aETsOQDmV7IiKJxQwWThbSwQ3VPR/0SGwTsSc5081+r p4IwL9I721gfQnwgUof/i3OQS3UBN6v3KV2bdrPVFgNPBL/Fy8ditUJoByLUoc/wDrIn VXEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1IjE5f3DRWrL7DyNrD/EPrz9NqvpJo1LzwPmSu0Loyo=; b=UgT9GLvvnri8c6UfwRLMYpbuntE5weTeGD/9LPdUJOBsDPtdaEBh8QniTpRhFX+Neq soGxp7k4B536/BMMz7gdODa3PRaJNxSndrGMQqj4Po7RlOSXXVY9FBiboyhQ0vo7bU1z e6mI8rAGofGwN662SbcFlixXNpFbTqaPsBUsP7liN0wS5ndAGOBKrBCAPAycZ3Whu+zP fB+GwWjEFRsTro0w7QUfh+QA4xB3ovQg/FEIIPiCU6XVxuphq5j0+ZrQ9Ua+NuWQOQAw sanNhSSibFhgM7l0tpo75/rAK5GhfXhU2VFO2ZFweBvbxQ8iW8+kPXpG9qbvT+B0ZSq4 CpGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVk5meZqx1I8jJwZM8VDhjA4h+ZexxOwli7YoRKKrTJUxN4l3y2 xdBPFvh1LV/pjUZKt9c3L7rZaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3pDhfMLHjqJZav0TSJad25iHzflnIoh0HNoBZKgS2hYkzGuQm5PMiuKy/xxFf6JF9qCXKSw== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:ed41:: with SMTP id c62mr23816689qkg.403.1582129287358; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:500::2:3bde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm210781qti.55.2020.02.19.08.21.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:21:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:21:25 -0500 From: Johannes Weiner To: Kenny Ho Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] drm, cgroup: Introduce lgpu as DRM cgroup resource Message-ID: <20200219162125.GC13406@cmpxchg.org> References: <20200214155650.21203-1-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> <20200214155650.21203-10-Kenny.Ho@amd.com> <20200214183401.GY2363188@phenom.ffwll.local> <20200214191754.GA218629@mtj.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:23:01 +0000 X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: juan.zuniga-anaya@amd.com, Daniel Vetter , Kenny Ho , "Kuehling, Felix" , jsparks@cray.com, nirmoy.das@amd.com, Maling list - DRI developers , lkaplan@cray.com, Alex Deucher , "Greathouse, Joseph" , amd-gfx mailing list , Jason Ekstrand , Tejun Heo , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , damon.mcdougall@amd.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:28:40PM -0500, Kenny Ho wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:17 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > > Also, a rather trivial high level question. Is drm a good controller > > name given that other controller names are like cpu, memory, io? > > There was a discussion about naming early in the RFC (I believe > RFCv2), the consensuses then was to use drmcg to align with the drm > subsystem. I have no problem renaming it to gpucg or something > similar if that is the last thing that's blocking acceptance. For > now, I would like to get some clarity on the implementation before > having more code churn. As far as precedence goes, we named the other controllers after the resources they control rather than the subsystem: cpu instead of scheduler, memory instead of mm, io instead of block layer etc. _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx