amd-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 09:20:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200321082041.GA28613@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320000345.GO20941@ziepe.ca>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:03:45PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Should tests enable the feature or the feature enable the test?
> > IMHO, if the feature is being compiled into the kernel, that should
> > enable the menu item for the test. If the feature isn't selected,
> > no need to test it :-)
> 
> I ment if DEVICE_PRIVATE should be a user selectable option at all, or
> should it be turned on when a driver like nouveau is selected.

I don't think it should be user selectable.  This is an implementation
detail users can't know about.

> Is there some downside to enabling DEVICE_PRIVATE?

The option itself adds a little more code to the core kernel, and
introduces a few additional branches in core mm code.

But more importantly it pulls in the whole pgmap infrastructure.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 19:32 ensure device private pages have an owner v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] memremap: add an owner field to struct dev_pagemap Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 20:55   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: handle multiple owners of device private pages in migrate_vma Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 21:43   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 21:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 22:49   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17  7:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 22:43       ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-18  9:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:47           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:59             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 17:32               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 23:14               ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-19 18:17                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 22:56                   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20  0:03                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21  8:20                       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-03-20  0:14                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  1:33                   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20 12:58                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: check the device private page owner " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 23:11   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20 13:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21  8:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21 12:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21 15:18         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17  5:31 ` ensure device private pages have an owner v2 Bharata B Rao
2020-03-19  0:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19  7:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19 11:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200321082041.GA28613@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).