amd-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lazar, Lijo" <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
To: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,
	arthur.marsh@internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:36:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <371afc58-5ee7-8171-90c2-05bb163e40ea@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411085453.38063-1-evan.quan@amd.com>



On 4/11/2022 2:24 PM, Evan Quan wrote:
> The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
> amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
> But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
> called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
> will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
> occur.
> 

What about using locked versions of get_sclk/mclk and leave the rest as 
they are?

Thanks,
Lijo

> By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
> protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
> restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
> issue. This comes with no real logics change.
> 
> Fixes: 3712e7a49459 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
> Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
> Link: https: //lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
> BugLink: https: //gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
> --
> v1->v2:
>    - rich the commit messages(Paul)
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c           | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>   .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c    | 10 -----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c    | 35 -----------------
>   .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c  | 10 -----
>   4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> index 5504d81c77b7..72e7b5d40af6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ int amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(struct amdgpu_device *adev, enum amd_pp_sensors senso
>   void amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
> +	int i;
>   
>   	if (!adev->pm.dpm_enabled)
>   		return;
> @@ -434,6 +435,15 @@ void amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   	if (!pp_funcs->pm_compute_clocks)
>   		return;
>   
> +	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
> +		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
> +		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
> +		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
> +			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
> +	}
> +
>   	mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>   	pp_funcs->pm_compute_clocks(adev->powerplay.pp_handle);
>   	mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
> @@ -443,6 +453,20 @@ void amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>   {
>   	int ret = 0;
>   
> +	if (adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_SI) {
> +		mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
> +		if (enable) {
> +			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = true;
> +			adev->pm.dpm.state = POWER_STATE_TYPE_INTERNAL_UVD;
> +		} else {
> +			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = false;
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
> +
> +		amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(adev);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	ret = amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(adev, AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD, !enable);
>   	if (ret)
>   		DRM_ERROR("Dpm %s uvd failed, ret = %d. \n",
> @@ -453,6 +477,21 @@ void amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>   {
>   	int ret = 0;
>   
> +	if (adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_SI) {
> +		mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
> +		if (enable) {
> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = true;
> +			/* XXX select vce level based on ring/task */
> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_level = AMD_VCE_LEVEL_AC_ALL;
> +		} else {
> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = false;
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
> +
> +		amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(adev);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	ret = amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(adev, AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE, !enable);
>   	if (ret)
>   		DRM_ERROR("Dpm %s vce failed, ret = %d. \n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
> index 9613c6181c17..d3fe149d8476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
> @@ -1028,16 +1028,6 @@ static int amdgpu_dpm_change_power_state_locked(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   void amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(void *handle)
>   {
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
> -	int i = 0;
> -
> -	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
> -		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
> -		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
> -		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
> -			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
> -	}
>   
>   	amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(adev);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
> index caae54487f9c..633dab14f51c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
> @@ -3892,40 +3892,6 @@ static int si_set_boot_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> -static int si_set_powergating_by_smu(void *handle,
> -				     uint32_t block_type,
> -				     bool gate)
> -{
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
> -
> -	switch (block_type) {
> -	case AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD:
> -		if (!gate) {
> -			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = true;
> -			adev->pm.dpm.state = POWER_STATE_TYPE_INTERNAL_UVD;
> -		} else {
> -			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = false;
> -		}
> -
> -		amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(handle);
> -		break;
> -	case AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE:
> -		if (!gate) {
> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = true;
> -			/* XXX select vce level based on ring/task */
> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_level = AMD_VCE_LEVEL_AC_ALL;
> -		} else {
> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = false;
> -		}
> -
> -		amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(handle);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>   static int si_set_sw_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	return (amdgpu_si_send_msg_to_smc(adev, PPSMC_MSG_SwitchToSwState) == PPSMC_Result_OK) ?
> @@ -8125,7 +8091,6 @@ static const struct amd_pm_funcs si_dpm_funcs = {
>   	.print_power_state = &si_dpm_print_power_state,
>   	.debugfs_print_current_performance_level = &si_dpm_debugfs_print_current_performance_level,
>   	.force_performance_level = &si_dpm_force_performance_level,
> -	.set_powergating_by_smu = &si_set_powergating_by_smu,
>   	.vblank_too_short = &si_dpm_vblank_too_short,
>   	.set_fan_control_mode = &si_dpm_set_fan_control_mode,
>   	.get_fan_control_mode = &si_dpm_get_fan_control_mode,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
> index dbed72c1e0c6..1eb4e613b27a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
> @@ -1503,16 +1503,6 @@ static void pp_pm_compute_clocks(void *handle)
>   {
>   	struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr = handle;
>   	struct amdgpu_device *adev = hwmgr->adev;
> -	int i = 0;
> -
> -	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
> -		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
> -		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
> -		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
> -			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
> -	}
>   
>   	if (!amdgpu_device_has_dc_support(adev)) {
>   		amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(adev);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11  8:54 [PATCH V2] drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI Evan Quan
2022-04-11 10:06 ` Lazar, Lijo [this message]
2022-04-22  8:27   ` Quan, Evan
2022-04-22  8:36     ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-04-22  8:53       ` Quan, Evan
2022-04-22  9:25         ` Lazar, Lijo
2022-04-22  9:43           ` Quan, Evan
2022-04-21  8:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-04-22  8:16   ` Quan, Evan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=371afc58-5ee7-8171-90c2-05bb163e40ea@amd.com \
    --to=lijo.lazar@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=arthur.marsh@internode.on.net \
    --cc=evan.quan@amd.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).