Re: [PATCH 2/8] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset

[Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>]

On 2020-02-19 08:53, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Calculate GPU offset in radeon_bo_gpu_offset without depending on
> bo->offset
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c    |  4 +---
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> index 30e32adc1fc6..b7c3fb2bfb54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
> @@ -2828,6 +2828,7 @@ extern void radeon_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 size
>  extern void radeon_program_register_sequence(struct radeon_device *rdev,
>  					     const u32 *registers,
>  					     const u32 array_size);
> +struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
>  
>  /*
>   * vm
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> index d23f2ed4126e..4d37571c7ff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,21 @@ static inline void radeon_bo_unreserve(struct radeon_bo *bo)
>   */
>  static inline u64 radeon_bo_gpu_offset(struct radeon_bo *bo)
>  {
> -	return bo->tbo.offset;
> +	struct radeon_device *rdev;
> +	u64 start = 0;
> +
> +	rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->tbo.bdev);
> +
> +	switch(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type) {

LKCS wants a space after a keyword, "switch (" .

> +	case TTM_PL_TT:
> +		start = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
> +		break;
> +	case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> +		start = rdev->mc.vram_start;
> +		break;
> +	}

Could this lookup have been parameterized by "mem_type"
to be looked up by an index (possibly "mem_type") to result
in something new like (pseudo-code):
     start = rdev->mc.mem_start_table[bo->tbo.mem.mem_type];
Where "mem_start_table" is a new table holding memory starts
of particular memories.
Then you don't need the switch-case.

Regards,
Luben

> +
> +	return (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start;
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> index badf1b6d1549..1c8303468e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
>  static int radeon_ttm_debugfs_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
>  static void radeon_ttm_debugfs_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
>  
> -static struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
> +struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
>  {
>  	struct radeon_mman *mman;
>  	struct radeon_device *rdev;
> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
>  		break;
>  	case TTM_PL_TT:
>  		man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
> -		man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
>  		man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
>  		man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
>  		man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
> @@ -104,7 +103,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
>  	case TTM_PL_VRAM:
>  		/* "On-card" video ram */
>  		man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
> -		man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.vram_start;
>  		man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
>  			     TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
>  		man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
> 

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx