From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
dianders@chromium.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
kvalo@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] mac80211: Add check for napi handle before WARN_ON
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:56:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dbdef912f9d61521011f638200fd451a3530568.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595351666-28193-2-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 22:44 +0530, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> The function ieee80211_rx_napi can be now called
> from a thread context as well, with napi context
> being NULL.
>
> Hence add the napi context check before giving out
> a warning for softirq count being 0.
>
> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.1-01040-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> net/mac80211/rx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> index a88ab6f..1e703f1 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> @@ -4652,7 +4652,7 @@ void ieee80211_rx_napi(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta,
> struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> struct ieee80211_rx_status *status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(skb);
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(softirq_count() == 0);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(napi && softirq_count() == 0);
FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is incorrect - we make assumptions on
softirqs being disabled in mac80211 for serialization and in place of
some locking, I believe.
johannes
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-22 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 17:14 [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 1/7] mac80211: Add check for napi handle before WARN_ON Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-22 12:56 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2020-07-23 18:26 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-24 6:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-26 16:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-30 12:40 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 21:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2020-07-22 12:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 12:55 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-22 13:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-23 6:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2021-03-22 23:57 ` Ben Greear
2021-03-23 1:20 ` Brian Norris
2021-03-23 3:01 ` Ben Greear
2021-03-23 7:45 ` Felix Fietkau
2021-03-25 9:45 ` Rakesh Pillai
2021-03-25 10:33 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-23 18:25 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 23:11 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 3/7] ath10k: Add module param to enable rx thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 4/7] ath10k: Do not exhaust budget on process tx completion Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 5/7] ath10k: Handle the rx packet processing in thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 6/7] ath10k: Add deliver to stack from thread context Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 7/7] ath10k: Handle rx thread suspend and resume Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 23:06 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-24 6:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:25 ` [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 18:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-23 18:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-24 6:20 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 22:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-22 9:12 ` David Laight
2020-07-25 8:16 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 10:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 12:25 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 14:08 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 14:57 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 15:41 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-26 11:16 ` David Laight
2020-07-28 16:59 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-29 1:34 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 1:22 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-26 8:10 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 8:32 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-26 8:59 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dbdef912f9d61521011f638200fd451a3530568.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pillair@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).