From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kmIso-0004iM-MS for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:57:04 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ath10k_pci_wait_for_target_init() should relax cpu for other task instead of calling medelay() so that cpu can run other tasks. Signed-off-by: lzhou --- From: Kalle Valo In-Reply-To: <20201203033729.382088-2-zhouliangya@126.com> References: <20201203033729.382088-2-zhouliangya@126.com> Message-Id: <20201207155657.2F69BC43461@smtp.codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:56:57 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: zhouliangya@126.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org zhouliangya@126.com wrote: > From: lzhou The subject and commit log is badly formatted, see patchwork link below. But how is schedule_timeout_interruptible() better than msleep()? Patch set to Changes Requested. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20201203033729.382088-2-zhouliangya@126.com/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k