archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <>
Cc: Ben Greear <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Per-chain rssi should sum the secondary channels
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:30:42 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <> wrote:

> From: Ben Greear <>
> This makes per-chain RSSI be more consistent between HT20, HT40, HT80.
> Instead of doing precise log math for adding dbm, I did a rough estimate,
> it seems to work good enough.
> Tested on ath10k-ct 9984 firmware.
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <>

Commented out code etc so I assume this is an RFC. Has anyone tested
this with upstream firmware?

Patch set to RFC.


ath10k mailing list

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17 18:33 [PATCH v2] ath10k: Per-chain rssi should sum the secondary channels greearb
2020-12-21 18:30 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
     [not found] ` <>
2020-12-21 22:21   ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).