ath10k.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kvalo@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:12:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79aeb83a288051bd3a2a3f15e5ac42e06f154d48.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210215104402.GC4507@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (sfid-20210215_114645_090502_64B4A89D)

On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 11:44 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> I think something like so will work, but please double check.

Yeah, that looks better.

> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -294,11 +294,15 @@ extern void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie);
>  
>  #define lockdep_depth(tsk)	(debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0)
>  
> -#define lockdep_assert_held(l)	do {				\
> -		WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l));	\
> +#define lockdep_assert_held(l)	do {					\
> +		WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 0));	\
>  	} while (0)

That doesn't really need to change? It's the same.

> -#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l)	do {			\
> +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l)	do {				\
> +		WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 1));	\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l)	do {				\
>  		WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held_type(l, 0));	\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index c1418b47f625..983ba206f7b2 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ noinstr int lock_is_held_type(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read)
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!lockdep_enabled()))
> -		return 1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */
> +		return -1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */

Maybe add lockdep_assert_not_held() to the comment, to explain the -1
(vs non-zero)?

johannes


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-15 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12 23:28 [PATCH 0/2] Add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan
2021-02-12 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan
2021-02-14 17:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-15 10:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-15 13:12       ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2021-02-15 16:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-15 16:10           ` Johannes Berg
2021-02-22 20:51             ` Shuah Khan
2021-02-12 23:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls Shuah Khan
2021-02-14  6:08   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79aeb83a288051bd3a2a3f15e5ac42e06f154d48.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).