From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120] helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ifhqi-0008CU-FM for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:07:05 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id d7so296017lfk.9 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 02:06:56 -0800 (PST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Enable virtual time-based airtime scheduler support on ath10k In-Reply-To: References: <1576221593-1086-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:06:53 +0100 Message-ID: <8736doedz6.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Justin Capella , Yibo Zhao Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k Justin Capella writes: > Would it make sense to consider skb->priority / QoS in the Access > Classifier selection? Erm, what? Not sure I understand what you're asking here... -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k