ath10k.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@chromium.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Fix the parsing error in service available event
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:44:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V0apTHaemMKvRx1HWLaO9ArC2t4ohfZ7-CthFz2NiA2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1603904469-598-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:01 AM Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> The wmi service available event has been
> extended to contain extra 128 bit for new services
> to be indicated by firmware.
>
> Currently the presence of any optional TLVs in
> the wmi service available event leads to a parsing
> error with the below error message:
> ath10k_snoc 18800000.wifi: failed to parse svc_avail tlv: -71
>
> The wmi service available event parsing should
> not return error for the newly added optional TLV.
> Fix this parsing for service available event message.
>
> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC
>
> Fixes: cea19a6ce8bf ("ath10k: add WMI_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT support")
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Access service_map_ext only if this TLV was sent in service
>   available event.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c | 4 +++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c     | 5 +++--
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h     | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> index 932266d..7b58341 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> @@ -1401,13 +1401,15 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_svc_avail_parse(struct ath10k *ar, u16 tag, u16 len,
>
>         switch (tag) {
>         case WMI_TLV_TAG_STRUCT_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT:
> +               arg->service_map_ext_valid = true;
>                 arg->service_map_ext_len = *(__le32 *)ptr;
>                 arg->service_map_ext = ptr + sizeof(__le32);
>                 return 0;
>         default:
>                 break;
>         }
> -       return -EPROTO;
> +
> +       return 0;

I notice your v2 now returns 0 for _all_ unknown tags.  v1 just had a
special case for "WMI_TLV_TAG_FIRST_ARRAY_ENUM".  I don't have enough
experience with this driver to know which is better, but this change
wasn't mentioned in the changes from v1.  I guess you had a change of
heart and decided this way was better?


>  }
>
>  static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_pull_svc_avail(struct ath10k *ar,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index 1fa7107..2e4b561 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -5751,8 +5751,9 @@ void ath10k_wmi_event_service_available(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>                             ret);
>         }
>
> -       ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map,
> -                              __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len));
> +       if (arg.service_map_ext_valid)
> +               ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map,
> +                                      __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len));

Your new patch still requires the caller to init the
"service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling, but I guess there's
not a whole lot more we can do because we might be parsing more than
one tag.  It does seem nice that at least we now have a validity bit
instead of just relying on a non-zero length to be valid.

It might be nice to have a comment saying that it's up to us to init
"arg.service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling
ath10k_wmi_pull_svc_avail(), but I won't insist.  Maybe that's obvious
to everyone but me...


-Doug

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-28 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28 17:01 [PATCH v2] ath10k: Fix the parsing error in service available event Rakesh Pillai
2020-10-28 18:44 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2020-10-29  5:29   ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-11-06  7:25   ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-13 22:45     ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-11-06  7:21 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=V0apTHaemMKvRx1HWLaO9ArC2t4ohfZ7-CthFz2NiA2A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuabhs@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pillair@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).