From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201107172152.828-1-ap420073@gmail.com> <20201107172152.828-18-ap420073@gmail.com> <175a3cc2738.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <175a3cc2738.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> From: Taehee Yoo Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 03:16:37 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 17/21] brcmfmac: set .owner to THIS_MODULE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: alex.aring@gmail.com, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, chi-hsien.lin@infineon.com, amitkarwar@gmail.com, ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com, Luciano Coelho , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, stefan@datenfreihafen.org, merez@codeaurora.org, stf_xl@wp.pl, pkshih@realtek.com, Nicolai Stange , chung-hsien.hsu@infineon.com, wright.feng@infineon.com, inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com, derosier@gmail.com, David Laight , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, Jakub Kicinski , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, michael.hennerich@analog.com, marcel@holtmann.org, hante.meuleman@broadcom.com, linux-wimax@intel.com, jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com, Kalle Valo , franky.lin@broadcom.com, huxinming820@gmail.com, Netdev , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, wil6210@qti.qualcomm.com, Johannes Berg , Larry Finger , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , pizza@shaftnet.org On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 02:41, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > Hi Arend, Thank you for the review! > On November 7, 2020 6:25:15 PM Taehee Yoo wrote: > > > If THIS_MODULE is not set, the module would be removed while debugfs is > > being used. > > It eventually makes kernel panic. > > Is this really a valid concern in the context of debugs? I tend to say it > is not. Whenever I am using debugs to debug my driver I make sure to avoid > removing it. I think getting rid of every scenario of the kernel panic is the first priority thing. So I'm sure that trying to avoid kernel panic is always valid even in the debugging context. Thanks a lot! Taehee Yoo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k