ath10k.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:16:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb815b1d-5377-95a1-9610-827a30cb8525@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a997ea7b6625428c21dc3e423e96ee54d6785e2.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On 2/26/21 11:03 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
>> @@ -5475,7 +5476,7 @@ noinstr int lock_is_held_type(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read)
>>   		/* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
>>   		 * and lockdep_assert_held()
>>   		 */
>> -		return -1;
>> +		return LOCK_STATE_UNKNOWN;
> 
> I'd argue that then the other two return places here should also be
> changed.
> 

Makes sense.

Since lock_is_held_type() simply returns what  __lock_is_held() for the
other cases, __lock_is_held() is the one that needs changes to use these 
defines.

thanks,
-- Shuah





_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-26 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 17:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan
2021-02-26 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan
2021-02-26 21:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-26 21:16     ` Shuah Khan
2021-03-01  8:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-26 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines Shuah Khan
2021-02-26 18:03   ` Johannes Berg
2021-02-26 18:16     ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2021-02-26 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb815b1d-5377-95a1-9610-827a30cb8525@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).