From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([2a01:4f8:191:4433::2] helo=sipsolutions.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ihWPy-0005Z6-L7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:19:00 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: fix issue in loop scenario From: Johannes Berg Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:18:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6f092bd44cfc581a219bd0f0506cc636@codeaurora.org> References: <1576221593-1086-1-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> <1576221593-1086-3-git-send-email-yiboz@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20191213_082426_564220_0827923D) <94471b2381bee394f9708eae8ba47129f3facd03.camel@sipsolutions.net> <6f092bd44cfc581a219bd0f0506cc636@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: yiboz@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 18:12 +0800, yiboz@codeaurora.org wrote: > > Yes, this is a fix to the first patch. Actually, the rest of two patches > are also serve the same. So, are you suggesting to merge them to the > first patch? Yes. > Previouly, I had added Toke's signature in this patch but Toke advised > to delete it. I feel a little bit confused about how to handle it. > Appreciate any detail guide. I guess that you have to discuss that with Toke, how he wants to handle it ... If he gave you a patch with his signed-off-by, then you should probably keep it? There's also "Co-developed-by" tag to give some sort of non-author developer credits. johannes _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k