From: UsuarioAnonimo <usuarioanonimo322@gmail.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] post kernel 4.3.x regressions in ath9k_htc
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:00:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472670009.23849.1@smtp.gmail.com> (raw)
I've addressed my concerns previously to the dev mailing list. My case
as stated previously is the following:
"My primary conntection to the internet has been the Alfa AWUS036NHA
wireless adapter which uses the Atheros AR9271 802.11n chipset. The
applicable linux driver/module and firmware is ath9k_htc. Ever since
the upgrade from linux kernel 4.3.x to 4.4.x the throughput of the
adapter chipset has been severely affected making the adapter basically
unusable."
After packet sniffing with Wireshark I'm not sure it's a throughput
issue, but rather a latency issue with dup_acks and spurious
retransmissions resulting fairly quickly in malformed packets and
reconnects as the throughput drops to basically zero. I wish I knew how
to analyze packets better and make the connection to driver performance.
I'm still convinced the regressions were introduced between kernel
4.3.x and 4.4.x. To that end I have done some investigating. It looks
like there were a lot of changes to ath9k between versions 4.3 and 4.4
that affect the AR9271 chipset. The changes seem to have to do with
initialization and calling the firmware, and calling the development
firmware.
One such change is:
An extra option is added in ath9k/htc_drv_init.c
41 int htc_use_dev_fw = 0;
42 module_param_named(use_dev_fw, htc_use_dev_fw, int, 0444);
43 MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_dev_fw, "Use development FW version");
But the big changes are in these two files, hif_usb.c and hif_usb.h
(diff output b/t vers. 4.3 and 4.4):
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/diff/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hif_usb.c?v=4.3;diffval=4.4;diffvar=v
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/diff/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hif_usb.h?v=4.3;diffval=4.4;diffvar=v
I was wondering if I'm on to something and if anyone with any knowledge
would mind double-checking the changes signaled in the diff files to
see if there could be a regression lurking in there.
Also, I am happy to run any tests and provide output and log files from
my various pre-4.3.x kernel OS intalls, which still function perfectly
well, and the 4.4.x and later OS installs, which are basically
unusable. They start of fast, but, within a matter of 30 seconds or so,
gum up and result in 100% packet loss.
Thank you very much for your attention and consideration.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20160831/6d688c4d/attachment.htm
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 19:00 UsuarioAnonimo [this message]
2016-09-01 7:19 ` [ath9k-devel] post kernel 4.3.x regressions in ath9k_htc Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472670009.23849.1@smtp.gmail.com \
--to=usuarioanonimo322@gmail.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).