From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:24:26 -0000 Subject: No subject Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org assumed the frequencies and numbers were correct, which is why I picked it up. > Is this trying to add 4.9 GHz channels in general for multiple different > use cases? And if so, what are those use cases? Or is this only for some > public safety cases? And if so, for which regulatory domains? I believe he has a client that requires this support in a Linux kernel. > To be frank, I really don't see how this would be even close to a state > that should be accepted into the upstream tree. Fair enough I'm dropping this. Kalle, I've marked this as rejected and archived on Patchwork. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/