All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/28] ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for card->deferred_resume_work
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:55:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0fee4cb-2347-7c21-e9b8-ad41133340aa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftmf2ifk.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>



On 8/5/19 8:29 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> 
> card->deferred_resume_work is used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined.
> but
> 	1) It is defined even though CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was not defined
> 	2) randam ifdef code is difficlut to read.

typos: random .. difficult

> This patch tidyup these issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> ---
>   include/sound/soc.h  |  5 +++--
>   sound/soc/soc-core.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
> index 6ac6481..85ad971 100644
> --- a/include/sound/soc.h
> +++ b/include/sound/soc.h
> @@ -1058,8 +1058,6 @@ struct snd_soc_card {
>   	int num_of_dapm_routes;
>   	bool fully_routed;
>   
> -	struct work_struct deferred_resume_work;
> -
>   	/* lists of probed devices belonging to this card */
>   	struct list_head component_dev_list;
>   	struct list_head list;
> @@ -1080,6 +1078,9 @@ struct snd_soc_card {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>   	struct dentry *debugfs_card_root;
>   #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +	struct work_struct deferred_resume_work;
> +#endif
>   	u32 pop_time;
>   
>   	void *drvdata;
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> index e8ed57a..2536ba4 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> @@ -701,9 +701,18 @@ int snd_soc_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_resume);
> +
> +static void soc_resume_init(struct snd_soc_card *card)
> +{
> +	/* deferred resume work */
> +	INIT_WORK(&card->deferred_resume_work, soc_resume_deferred);
> +}
>   #else
>   #define snd_soc_suspend NULL
>   #define snd_soc_resume NULL
> +static inline void soc_resume_init(struct snd_soc_card *card)
> +{
> +}
>   #endif
>   
>   static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops null_dai_ops = {
> @@ -1975,10 +1984,7 @@ static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>   
>   	soc_init_card_debugfs(card);
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> -	/* deferred resume work */
> -	INIT_WORK(&card->deferred_resume_work, soc_resume_deferred);
> -#endif
> +	soc_resume_init(card);
>   
>   	snd_soc_dapm_new_controls(&card->dapm, card->dapm_widgets,
>   				  card->num_dapm_widgets);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-06 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-06  1:25 [PATCH 00/28] ASoC: cleanup patches for soc-core Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:27 ` [PATCH 01/28] ASoC: soc-core: use device_register() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 02/28] ASoC: soc-core: set component->debugfs_root NULL Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06 14:49   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-06 16:22     ` Mark Brown
2019-08-06 16:46       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-06 16:54         ` Mark Brown
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 03/28] ASoC: soc-core: add comment for for_each_xxx Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 04/28] ASoC: soc-core: check return value of snd_soc_add_dai_link() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 05/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't use for_each_card_links_safe() at snd_soc_find_dai_link() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 06/28] ASoC: soc-core: reuse rtdcom at snd_soc_rtdcom_add() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 07/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't check widget for snd_soc_dapm_new_controls() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  4:35   ` Ranjani Sridharan
2019-08-06 18:07     ` Mark Brown
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 08/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't check controls for snd_soc_add_component_controls() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  4:38   ` Ranjani Sridharan
2019-08-06  1:28 ` [PATCH 09/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't check routes for snd_soc_dapm_add_routes() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  4:41   ` Ranjani Sridharan
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 10/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't check controls for snd_soc_add_card_controls() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 11/28] ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() at soc_init_card_debugfs() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 12/28] ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded list_empty() check for snd_soc_try_rebind_card() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 13/28] ASoC: soc-core: remove verbose debug message from soc_bind_dai_link() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06 14:54   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-07  0:13     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 14/28] ASoC: soc-core: remove duplicated soc_is_dai_link_bound() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  4:49   ` Ranjani Sridharan
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 15/28] ASoC: soc-core: tidyup for card->deferred_resume_work Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06 14:55   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-08-06  1:29 ` [PATCH 16/28] ASoC: soc-core: initialize rtd->list Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  5:00   ` Ranjani Sridharan
2019-08-06  6:29     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 17/28] ASoC: soc-core: define soc_dpcm_debugfs_add() for non CONFIG_DEBUG_FS Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 18/28] ASoC: soc-core: dai_link check under soc_dpcm_debugfs_add() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 19/28] ASoC: soc-core: merge snd_soc_initialize_card_lists() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 20/28] ASoC: soc-core: remove unneeded dai_link check from snd_soc_remove_dai_link() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 21/28] ASoC: soc-core: add NOTE to snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 22/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't call snd_soc_component_set_jack() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 23/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't alloc memory carelessly when creating debugfs Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06 15:05   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 24/28] ASoC: soc-core: soc_cleanup_card_resources() become void Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 25/28] ASoC: soc-core: initialize component list Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06 15:07   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-07  0:18     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 26/28] ASoC: soc-core: initialize list at one place Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:30 ` [PATCH 27/28] ASoC: soc-dai: use bit field for bus_control Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-06  1:31 ` [PATCH 28/28] ASoC: soc-topology: use for_each_component_dais() at remove_dai() Kuninori Morimoto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0fee4cb-2347-7c21-e9b8-ad41133340aa@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.